Audible Activism in American Sign Language Poetry
Delicia Daniels on Poetry’s Fraught Relationship with Hearing and Speech
Delicia Daniels | September 2023
Delicia Daniels
Poetry’s rolling definition in American Sign Language literature positions this genre as an unstable tool, adjustable for all things inclusive. In Signing the Body Poetic: Essays on American Sign Language Literature, edited by H-Dirksen Bauman, Jennifer Nelson, and Heidi Rose, the editors observe the earliest sign for poetry as a mechanism geared towards a hearing landscape. Bauman, Nelson, and Rose note:
The original sign was formed by the signed letter P moving over the outstretched and slightly bent arm. This sign was originally derived from the sign MUSIC or SONG, which has the same hand movements and arm position but uses a flat hand instead of the signed letter P. That poetry is a form of verbal music served as the initial default setting that informed this sign; further, the substitution of the letter “P” for “poetry” indicates the alphabetic, scripted dimension of hearing-centered poetics. During the 1989 international Deaf Way conference, however, a group of Deaf poets expressed the need for a sign that would not be derived from MUSIC or from phonetic writing but would instead reflect the embodied nature of sign poetry. 1
In this space, the initial sign caters to a world where the inability to hear warrants no agency. Literature is placed on an audible pedestal. Phonocentrism, the unquestioned orientation that speech and hearing are the only fully human modalities of language, 2 plagues this literary arena. Historical traces of this apathetic linguistic treatment appeared in local newspapers; for instance, The Wichita Daily Eagle printed the following lecture by Rudolph Hatfield on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in 1902 in a column titled Talked on Longfellow: Rudolph Hatfield Tells of Life and Works of Poet:
The distinctive difference between the poetic and the non-poetic soul is simply in degree of sensibilities.
One walks out in the world, in attentive communion with the voices, forms, and colors about him; to him there is sweet converse in the rustling leaves, purling waters, swaying and sighing trees. Another passes amid the same suggestions, seeing not, hearing not—as one born sightless, deaf and dumb. 3
Audism, “bias or discrimination against people who cannot hear or have difficulty hearing, or prejudice or hostility toward them,” arises from this toxic atmosphere. Deaf poets are creating revolutionary poems against this bigotry on the page and the stage.
The five parameters traditionally used in American Sign Language poems are facial expressions, location, hand movement, palm orientation, and handshape.
Rhyme
In Analysing Sign Language: Poetry, Rachel Sutton-Spence considers rhyme any repetition of one parameter or more. 4 Agatha Hansen, Valedictorian in the class of 1893 and the first woman to receive a bachelor’s degree from Gallaudet University, 5 intentionally creates rhymes aligned with sound to rupture violent impediments placed upon Deaf individuals. Hanson’s poem titled Semi-Mute compellingly reverberates every poetic phrase. The first two stanzas state:
A river deep of silence
Either swells our souls around.
Its tide flows and submerges
The weaker tide of sound.
Now memory flashes through us,
Now lingers with us long.
Sweet strains of vanished music
Make up its haunting song. 6
There is a hint of deserted composition. A gentle ripple rendered still. Lyrics that once held the reader above water, now baptize instantaneously through absence. Wanting to seek what can no longer be heard is religion at its best. Throughout this piece, we hold fast to memory, channeling verbal verses like psalms to hear sweet music once again. Synergy between AROUND and SOUND emphasizes this recurring musical tide. The rhyme schemes for both terms originate from common handshapes. To sign the word SOUND, the poet displays one enclosed fist with the dominant hand, stretches one index finger, and touches one ear. In the same manner, the term AROUND is created by forming one flat shaped O on one hand, developing one fist with one stretched index finger on the other hand while generating at least one circle around the flat shaped O with an inverted index finger.
The second stanza unveils a poignant aftermath of residue that will not wash away. Sorrow remains a constant presence. Memory composes the tune that brazenly pierces the body. The rhyme scheme in LONG and SONG, derived from a shared location, underscores this whirlwind of repetitive grief. LONG is signed when the poet creates one fist with one stretched index finger and runs it along the forearm. Much like LONG, SONG is signed by waving one palm along a partially bent forearm.
The visual, kinetic, and spatial energy of each line fuels each poetic movement of the body. The sensory experience in the lines connecting LONG and SONG are radical. The volume is high. Audible protests resound.
The final two stanzas turn towards an optimistic approach. Haunting momentum is transformed into a mighty force. Hanson notes:
Yet must we bear our burden,
Yet must we walk our way,
And slowly, surely build a work
That will endure for aye.
We can control the future,
Can live or well or ill.
Let us clasp hands and forward.
There is no standing still. 7
Forecasting a confident future over a foundation filled with pain propositions a unique perspective. Healing begins when we acknowledge emotional weight we own. Although comparable ASL signs “WAY and AYE” and “STILL and ILL” do not share the same handshapes, location, or movements, the terms interlock contextually. Difficult journeys reconstructed our “way,” remain an ever-present source of strength. This path is an advantageous art form built to engineer solutions. ILL is signed by raising one palm with a bent middle finger to the forehead while lowering the second palm with a bent middle finger to the stomach. STILL is signed with two turned down Y shapes on both hands. The ties between STILL and ILL bring about a constant state of return. In this mode, doors remain open to progressive contemplation despite the status of living well or with illness.
Repetition of Location
The location of a sign’s articulation may be determined by the citation form (or basic dictionary form) of the sign because each sign must have its location parameter. These discourse factors determine where we place things in space so that we can refer to them and understand the relationship between the signs and their referents in our signing space. 8
Deaf artist John Lee Clark graduated from the Minnesota State Academy for the Deaf. He temporarily attended Gallaudet University. Clark became the first signer, Deaf, or DeafBlind to publish in Poetry magazine. 9 Clark’s Long Goodbyes impressively details alternative ways to part with family and guests in Deaf households. An excerpt of Clark’s poem is below:
I miss all of the long goodbyes
of my parents’ guests
taking their leave by not leaving
when it was time to go. Someone
would sign
Better go home we but hours would pass
Around our round table—
the bowls of our hands offering
confession after confession
assuring us that we are we—
before anyone stands up.
Then others, sighing, will stand up
Slowly and slowly walk
Through our house, pausing
Where the walls offer stories,
reasons to stay longer
and touch more things with our hands.
I remember how long,
how wonderfully they stood 10
The first three stanzas serve as instructions for sincere goodbyes. Signing BETTER GO HOME versus GOODBYE is intentional and intimate. The closeness of BETTER and HOME can be linked to the proximity of the sign and the body. Sutton-Spence asserts that signs contacting the body can be seen as more “personal” than signs that do not contact the body or move away from the body. 11 BETTER, signed along the body, is created when one hand crosses the chin and ends with an A shape. To sign HOME, the poet designs one flattened O with one hand, touching one cheek twice. The reader can feel the kinetic warmth between BETTER as a term of endearment and HOME as an exclusive area with affectionate taps against delicate skin.In stanza three, HANDS and CONFESSION are immersed in a profound face-to-face tradition. HANDS is signed by crossing one palm diagonally across the bottom of the second palm. The soft implication of crossing the heart in this act is a pleasant one. CONFESSION is signed by placing one flat palm to the heart and lifting it away with the palm facing up. Private and public signs that contain phrases such as CONFESSION and HANDS are visually received and disseminated with fondness. Admissions are exclusive. Both terms have connotative relations to confidential moments. Clark cleverly inserts political sensory experiences that reclaim authority over speech: “Hands offer confessions,” “walls offer stories,” and “touching more things with hands” are highly encouraged.
Repetition of Handshape Patterns
Handshapes can link ideas or bring out further connotations behind signs in the poem, often drawing on the emotional effects commonly associated with particular handshapes. 12 Deaf artist Curtis Robbins graduated from Gallaudet College in 1967. He taught computer applications and American Sign Language for more than thirty-five years. 13 Robbins’s DeafPoetorWhat? projects a series of tough and gentle qualities. The first eight lines of Robbins’s DeafPoetorWhat? state:
They keep asking the same question:
Are you a Deaf poet
or
A Poet who is deaf?
I shudder at the question.
I can’t even think of a better way
to express the rhetoric.
I’m lost. 14
The questions raised throughout this piece are complicated. To ask a Deaf poet if they are “deaf or Deaf” in the world of this piece places the poet in a detrimental box. Furthermore, signing the term SHUDDER cues the strain and turmoil circling around this question. Sutton-Spence claims, “In general, the ‘5’ and ‘B’ handshapes, being open, are symbolically more ‘positive’ in connotation than closed handshapes, such as ‘A’ or ‘A’. Handshapes that are bent at the knuckles, such as ‘5’ or ‘V’ are associated with more tension and are ‘harsher’ than other non-claw handshapes, which are more relaxed and ‘softer’.” 15 The majority of the letters in this term are shaped along a cold tone. SHUDDER is created with an isolated closed fist for “S,” a stiff bent oval shape for “D,” and confined curved fingers for “E.” To understand unclear methodologies, we must first dissect the root of the chaos. Handshape patterns in SHUDDER offer a problematic prelude to an uneasy story.
In the next line, the word “even” consumes the bulk of a speechless search for answers. The poet’s need for a remedy reveals itself through dark shaped patterns that complement EVEN contextually. Handshape patterns for E in EVEN contain four tight bent fingers followed by two rough bent fingers for N. The reader is met with a burdensome wind that demands a peaceful wall. The next signed phrase, I’M LOST sums up the condition of this matter.
The second half of the poem re-emphasizes the bitter response to an attempt to establish a proper identity in the face of difficult inquiries. Robbins notes:
Do you sign?
or
Do you sing?
or
Do you truly hear such peripatetic words? 16
DO and SIGN in the first line prompts the individual on the receiving end of the inquiries to consider the poet’s anguish. Handshape patterns in DO begin with a jagged agenda, bending a sharp D with a flat shaped O and stretched index finger. SIGN, not far behind, reiterates this critical message. The repetition of DO and SING offer ongoing means of high energetic anticipation. SING spreads a reciprocal air of accountability around the individual expected to answer. S in SING, signed with a determined balled fist, revisits a swift declaration: one sharp shift from linguistic to audible influence. The final line in the poem ends with an accurate assessment of truth for Deaf poets: I AM WHAT YOU READ. 17
Delicia Daniels is a poet, activist, and biographer. Her first publication, The Language We Cry In, was selected as the Discovery Prize winner for the 2017 Writers’ League of Texas Book Awards. Her second poetry collection, Abolition Chronicles, was selected as a finalist for the 2023 Center for African American Poetry and Poetics Book Prize. She holds a PhD in English with a concentration in Creative Writing from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette and an MFA in Creative Writing from Chicago State University. Daniels is an Assistant Professor of Creative Writing at Warren Wilson College.
Notes
1. H-Dirksen Bauman, Jennifer Nelson, and Heidi Rose. Signing the Body Poetic: Essays on American Sign Language Literature (University of California Press: Los Angeles, 2006), 1.
2. Ibid., 4
3. “Talked on Longfellow: Rudolph Hatfield Tells of Life and Works of Poet,” the Wichita Daily Eagle (Wichita, KS), January 8, 1902.
4. Rachel Sutton-Spence, Analysing Sign Language: Poetry (Palgrave MacMillan: New York, 2005), 43.
5. John Lee Clark ed. Deaf American Poetry: An Anthology (Gallaudet University Press: District of Columbia, 2009), 83.
6. Ibid., 85.
7. Ibid.
8. Ibid., 38.
9. Ibid., 269.
10. Ibid., 272.
11. Ibid., 38.
12. Ibid., 26.
13. Ibid., 169.
14. Ibid., 177.
15. Ibid., 26.
16. Ibid., 177.
17. Ibid.